2014 Vol. 98 No. 6

24 HќќѠіђџȱ юћјђџ Ѣћђȱ2014 ',5(&7256 6(1,25 0$1$*(0(17 Companies of all kinds are continually trying to cut costs, ’–™›˜ŸŽȱŽĜŒ’Ž—Œ’ŽœǰȱŠ—ȱ’—›˜žŒŽȱ products and services to create more value. Financial institutions are no ’쎛Ž—ǯȱ ˜ ŽŸŽ›ǰȱž—•’”Žȱ˜‘Ž›ȱ ‹žœ’—ŽœœŽœǰȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱ’—œ’ž’˜—œȱŠŒŽȱ risks and regulations that constantly challenge their ability to drive operational costs down and improve ™›˜ęŠ‹’•’¢ǯ As the number and severity of risks grow, managing risk has all but consumed management. At the œŠ–Žȱ’–Žǰȱœ˜–Žȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱ’—œ’ž’˜—œȱ have developed bad habits, such as practicing risk management in “silos” — areas that operate in isolation from ˜‘Ž›œȱȯȱ•ŽŠ’—ȱ˜ȱ’—ŽĜŒ’Ž—Œ’ŽœȱŠ—ȱ increased costs. By establishing an integrated and holistic enterprise-wide risk management program that is repeatable, process-driven and aligned with business development œ›ŠŽ¢ǰȱ¢˜ž›ȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱ’—œ’ž’˜—ȱ can establish a program to achieve œ’—’ęŒŠ—ȱŒ˜œȱœŠŸ’—œȱŠ—ȱ ŽĜŒ’Ž—Œ’Žœǯ Why Is Risk Management Important? ‘Žȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱœŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽœȱ’—žœ›¢ȱ and its regulators have become exceedingly risk-focused over the •ŠœȱŽŒŠŽǯȱ Š—ŠŽ–Ž—ȱ–žœȱ—˜ ȱ adopt more modern practices and methods in assessing and mitigating risk, while discarding outmoded ways of evaluating and controlling risks and controls. Regulators today are taking a hard •˜˜”ȱŠȱ‘˜ ȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱ’—œ’ž’˜—œȱ are integrating various risk areas, previously viewed as disparate: interest-rate risk, liquidity risk, compensation risk, market risk, operational risk and reputational risk. Regulators also are focusing not only on money center banks, but also on community banks. The outcomes of risk management programs practiced at smaller institutions are —˜ȱ’쎛Ž—ȱ‘Š—ȱŠȱ‘Žȱ•Š›Ž›ȱ˜—Žœǰȱ though the risk activities are scaled to the complexity of the institutions. The Challenge of Current Risk Management Practices ȱ ‘Ž—ȱŠœ”Žǰȱ–˜œȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱ institutions will claim to have risk management practices. Yet in reality, many assess the full spectrum of their risks in silos. This isolated approach can weaken an institution by: % Driving up costs; % Limiting the institution’s ability to practice sound governance and compliance; % ˜›Œ’—ȱž™•’ŒŠ’˜—ȱ˜ȱŽě˜›ȱŠ—ȱ duplicity of tools; % —Œ˜ž›Š’—ȱ˜ŸŽ›’—ŸŽœ–Ž—ȱ’—ȱ technologies; % Šœ”’—ȱ™›˜ŒŽœœȱ˜ŸŽ›•Š™œȱŠ—ȱ inconsistencies; % Under-allocating management to some high-risk areas. A Clearer Picture of ERM An enterprise-wide risk –Š—ŠŽ–Ž—ȱǻ Ǽȱ™›˜›Š–ȱ essentially is a management technique that allows community- ‹ŠœŽȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱ’—œ’ž’˜—œȱ˜ȱ‹ŽŒ˜–Žȱ –˜›ŽȱŽĜŒ’Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ‹ŽĴŽ›ȱŠ‹•Žȱ˜ȱ compete in an increasingly complex environment. The basic elements of a risk management program already Ž¡’œȱ’—ȱ–Š—¢ȱꗊ—Œ’Š•ȱ’—œ’ž’˜—œȱ in the form of policies, risk assessments, monitoring programs яќѢѡȱѡѕђȱ Ѣѡѕќџ Bharat Nair leads product and technology strategy at WolfPAC Integrated Risk Management, an enterprise risk management solution that automates ‘Žȱ’Ž—’ęŒŠ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ›’œ”œǰȱ‘›ŽŠœȱŠ—ȱŒ˜—›˜•ȱŠ™œǯȱ He previously served in senior management positions with various other technology organizations, ’—Œ•ž’—ȱ Ž•ę˜ȱ ŽŒž›’¢ǰȱ ‹Ž›ŽŽ—ȱ ›˜ž™ȱŠ—ȱ Brooks Automation. Nair earned advanced degrees from Boston University and from the South Dakota Œ‘˜˜•ȱ˜ȱ ’—ŽœȱŠ—ȱ ŽŒ‘—˜•˜¢ȱŠ—ȱ‘ŠœȱŠĴŠ’—Žȱ™›˜›Š–ȱ–Š—ŠŽ–Ž—ȱ ŒŽ›’ęŒŠ’˜—ǯȱ ‘ŽȱŠž‘˜›ȱŒŠ—ȱ‹Žȱ›ŽŠŒ‘ŽȱŠȱŜŗŝȬŚřşȬşŝŖŖǰȱŽ–Š’•DZȱ‹—Š’›ȓ ˜•Š—Œ˜–™Š—¢ǯŒ˜–ǯȱ ˜• ȱ —Ž›ŠŽȱ ’œ”ȱ Š—ŠŽ–Ž—ȱ’œȱŠ—ȱ associate member of the Indiana Bankers Association. How ERM Can Help Your Institution

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3NDExNQ==