INTERACTION WITH FEDERAL POLICY A recent federal Executive Order directs agencies to reexamine how AI contributes to disparate‑impact discrimination. This creates a dual‑layer compliance environment: Illinois rules and evolving federal enforcement priorities. Where AI Retail Tools Create Legal Risk Many AI tools used for sales or customer service can unintentionally cross into regulated territory. LEAD SCORING AND ROUTING If AI deprioritizes leads based on demographic proxies — such as income, neighborhood or language patterns — it may create discriminatory outcomes. Even if the tool is intended for marketing, it can still raise legal concerns. CHATBOTS AND VIRTUAL ASSISTANTS Chatbots that answer employment‑related questions, screen applicants or route job inquiries differently based on AI‑detected traits may violate Illinois’ notice and nondiscrimination requirements. PREDICTIVE SCHEDULING TOOLS AI that recommends which employees should receive more hours, training, or advancement opportunities is directly covered by the new Illinois law. F&I AUTOMATION AI‑driven payment calculators or product recommendations must avoid unfair or deceptive practices. Proper disclosures and transparency are essential to avoid consumer‑protection legal issues. How Some Dealerships Are Responding Forward‑thinking dealerships are not waiting for enforcement actions. They are proactively adapting their operations to align with Illinois’ new rules by: • Conducting AI impact assessments and reviewing all AI tools — CRM systems, ATS platforms, chatbots, scheduling software — to determine whether they influence employment decisions, create disparate outcomes or necessitate proper disclosures. • Implementing AI‑use notices and preparing standardized disclosures for applicants and employees. • Vetting vendors for compliance and demanding contractual assurances that AI vendors comply with Illinois law, provide transparency and allow audits of automated decision‑making processes. • Maintaining human oversight, making the final call on hiring, promotion and discipline. This “human‑in‑the‑loop” approach reduces legal exposure. • Training managers to understand AI’s limitations, recognize potential bias and document human review of AI‑generated recommendations. Conclusion AI‑driven retailing offers enormous potential for Illinois auto dealerships — from improved customer experiences to more efficient operations. But with new state regulations in effect, and out-of-state laws and regulations that are potentially impactful (e.g., California), dealers must adopt AI responsibly. Those who combine innovation with compliance will be best positioned to thrive in 2026 and beyond. Julie A. Cardosi is Principal of the private firm, Law Office of Julie A. Cardosi, P.C., in Springfield, Illinois, and has been practicing law for nearly 40 years, exclusively representing the unique business interests of automobile dealers statewide for over 30 years. Formerly in-house staff legal counsel for the Illinois Automobile Dealers Association, she concentrates her practice in the areas of dealership ownership transfers (asset purchases and stock acquisitions), mergers and acquisitions, franchise law and franchise issues, factory relations, corporate law, add points, commercial real estate transfers, employment, and other issues impacting day-to-day dealership operations. Dealers may wish to seek the advice of their own counsel on the subject matter of this article. “If AI deprioritizes leads based on demographic proxies — such as income, neighborhood or language patterns — it may create discriminatory outcomes. 17 ILLINOIS AUTOMOBILE DEALER NEWS
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3NDExNQ==