to the past than the present. It’s time to stop fighting the last war and stay focused on the present and the future. ABA and the state associations have stepped up on behalf of our members, challenging misguided final rules in court wherever warranted and pushing back with facts and data to stop faulty assumptions from underpinning major regulatory changes and bogus claims about our industry from spreading. We’ve had some notable successes over the last four years, but it hasn’t been easy. As we welcome 2025, a new presidential administration and a new Congress, it’s time to reset the conversation around banking regulation. That effort began right after the election during the transition, as ABA worked to communicate our priorities to the incoming Trump administration. With leadership changeovers anticipated at the regulatory agencies following the inauguration — including at the FDIC, OCC and CFPB — we expect to have the opportunity to share our perspective with the new players and help refocus the conversation around rightsizing the supervision and regulation of the banking sector. But while we can expect some of the new regulators to pause some proposed rulemakings altogether, and Congress could use the Congressional Review Act to undo some of the most recent regulatory proposals, it’s important to remember that the new administration and new Congress will not wield a magic wand. Undoing policy changes in a durable way can take just as long as putting new regulations into place since the Administrative Procedure Act and its notice and comment procedures apply. As we welcome 2025, a new presidential administration and a new Congress, it’s time to reset the conversation around banking regulation. 13 NEBRASKA BANKER
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3NDExNQ==