15 Recommended: These treatments are appropriate for the type and severity of a distress. However, it is important to confer with a professional about your existing conditions. (See list of contractors in the back of this booklet.) Not Recommended: These treatments are not appropriate for the type and severity of a distress. Feasible: These treatments are acceptable but not the best choice, either because they don’t fully address the problem or because they go beyond what is needed to address the problem. *Depending on the cause of the distress. Severity of Longitudinal Cracking Preservation Treatments LOW (Very Mild) MEDIUM (Noticeable, but Not Extensive) HIGH (Extensive in Most Locations) Crack Sealing RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED Hot Pour Mastic/Patch FEASIBLE RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED Spray Applied Preservation NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED Seal Coat NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED Fog Seal/ Rejuvenator NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED Sand Seal FEASIBLE FEASIBLE/ RECOMMENDED* NOT RECOMMENDED Scrub Seal FEASIBLE FEASIBLE NOT RECOMMENDED Spot Repair FEASIBLE FEASIBLE/ RECOMMENDED* FEASIBLE/ RECOMMENDED* Slurry Seal FEASIBLE FEASIBLE NOT RECOMMENDED Chip Seal RECOMMENDED FEASIBLE NOT RECOMMENDED Micro-Surfacing FEASIBLE FEASIBLE NOT RECOMMENDED Cape Seal FEASIBLE FEASIBLE NOT RECOMMENDED MAINTENANCE AND REHAB OPTIONS Cold In-Place Recycling (CIR) FEASIBLE FEASIBLE FEASIBLE Hot In-Place Recycling (HIR) FEASIBLE FEASIBLE FEASIBLE Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Overlay (Less than 2”) FEASIBLE FEASIBLE FEASIBLE Bonded Wearing Course (BWC) (Less than 1”) FEASIBLE FEASIBLE FEASIBLE Ultra-Thin HMA (0.5” - 1.0”) FEASIBLE NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODQxMjUw