Based on my observations within the profession, several factors contribute to this ongoing dilution of the title: Technology Democratization: With GPS and drone tools becoming more accessible, more workers are “doing survey work” without professional oversight. Lack of Public Awareness: Clients and contractors often do not distinguish between a field tech and a licensed surveyor. Industry Language: Job titles like “survey technician,” “field surveyor” or “drone surveyor” further blur the lines. While the term “survey technician” can be appropriate, its use should ideally be aligned with certification standards such as the National Society of Professional Surveyors (NSPS) Certified Survey Technician (CST) program, which clearly defines skill levels and responsibilities. This ensures that terminology reflects appropriate qualifications and promotes consistency within the profession. Construction layout technicians have become commonplace within many large construction companies. These individuals are often highly skilled in operating advanced equipment and executing precise layout tasks in the field. As a result, they have frequently been labeled as “surveyors” by default. However, according to UCA 58-22-102(9), and Utah Department of Professional Licensing R156-22-102(4) their work more closely aligns with the definition of engineering surveying, which includes activities required to support the sound conception, planning, design, construction, maintenance and operation of engineered projects — not the professional land surveying work, defined in UCA58-22-102(12) requiring a professional license. This distinction is critical for protecting the public and maintaining professional accountability. These trends have real consequences — not only for the profession, but for the public who depend on licensed land surveyors for accurate and legally defensible work. Why It Matters Just as the misuse of the title “engineer” is prohibited to preserve trust, expertise and legal accountability, the terms “surveyor” and “land surveyor” should be held to similar standards. Improper or unlicensed surveying work can lead to costly boundary disputes, construction errors or title issues. These issues often escalate quickly into legal conflicts requiring attorneys and courts to resolve. Moreover, licensed surveyors have a responsibility to public welfare, much like engineers or architects. Diluting the title weakens the public perception of these responsibilities, contributing to a common misunderstanding. The public often only sees field crews or technicians and assumes that their work encompasses all aspects of surveying, without recognizing the legal, mathematical, and boundary expertise required of licensed professionals. It is important to acknowledge that construction layout technicians and survey technicians play an essential role in our industry. These positions demand technical skill, attention to detail, and proficiency in advanced equipment. However, without proper context, the public may assume these individuals carry the legal authority of a professional land surveyor. We can help the public and related professions understand the distinction, while respecting the role of each person. While these issues carry serious implications, they also present an opportunity to strengthen the profession through clearer communication and improved collaboration. Professional Collaboration This effort to protect the professional title “surveyor” should be viewed not as a critique, but as an opportunity to educate and elevate. Field crew personnel, layout specialists and others are vital to our projects — they bring the data and accuracy that fuel our decisions. Their skills form the backbone of field operations. However, the legal authority to determine boundaries, resolve encroachments and certify surveys lies solely with licensed professional land surveyors. Most technicians, through no fault of their own, operate without formal training in boundary law or the legal frameworks governing property rights. Often, they are unaware of the liability exposure involved in tasks that appear straightforward but carry serious consequences. Our goal should be to foster collaboration, mentorship and growth — encouraging technicians to develop and advance, while maintaining a clear distinction that protects the public and supports the integrity of our profession. Even though technicians are highly capable and essential in field operations, they may be unaware of the difference and operate without professional oversight in matters involving boundary determinations or the legal elements involved in land surveying. With guidance from licensed professionals, technicians can become aware of the critical legal and professional responsibilities that lie beyond their scope. Building on this collaborative foundation, several practical steps can help restore clarity and strengthen public understanding. We have a timely opportunity — both as individuals and through our professional organizations — to reinforce the true meaning and responsibilities of the professional land surveyor. UCLS Foresights 8
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3NDExNQ==