Hoosier Banker 33 began much earlier with the Fed acting quickly to soften the blow and lower rates. The drop in short-term rates was quick, and the 10-year Treasury followed suit, dropping from 1.60% at the start of the recession to a low of 0.55% by August 2020. Following that low, the 10yr started moving higher and currently sits around 1.60% at the time of this writing, a level that is significant given the behavior of past recessions. Upon the beginning of recovery following the previous two recessions, the 10yr regained its pre-recession levels and saw very little gains from that point, while short-term rates continued to either decline or remain lower for a prolonged period. The early 2000s recession, known for the dot-com bubble, saw the 10yr at 5.00% and eight months later hit 4.90% at the official end of the recession. During the Great Recession, which lasted more than twice as long, the 10yr entered the recession at 3.90% and hit around 3.60% at the beginning of the next recovery. In both of those cases, the 10yr saw most of its gains in that initial jump to start the recovery, with very little if any increase beyond that. While the current recession is still considered to be ongoing, the 10yr has already reached its pre-recession levels. With the Federal Reserve pledging to continue keeping rates low, the opportunity for financial institutions to recoup lost margins is now. The best way we can tackle both the pressures of future economic uncertainty as well as opportunity costs is to actively manage the risks to our balance sheet through sound asset liability management. While many will claim they already do this, the fact remains that a large number of financial institutions only manage parts of their balance sheets, leaving others on autopilot. The best-performing institutions take advantage of all the tools available to them to ensure that these risks are properly managed, regardless of what the economy and interest rates are doing. Stabilizing Funding One of the biggest fears that examiners have put into financial institutions is the idea that, without warning, we may be faced with a large runoff in our deposit portfolios. All too often this fear causes many institutions to overcompensate by holding on to more liquidity than is necessary. Looking at current call report data as deposits soar to record levels once again, many institutions find themselves questioning whether this liquidity is here to stay, or is on the way out as quickly as it came. Maintaining excess levels of cash to have sufficient liquidity is not only inadequate risk management, but it is also the most expensive method from an opportunity cost standpoint. Proper liquidity management means having sufficient cashflows as well as contingent liquidity sources to meet any loan demand or deposit withdrawals. The better-performing institutions tend to make use of the opportunities in wholesale funding from a source such as the Federal Home Loan Bank. With borrowing rates remaining low, the opportunity exists to make a positive spread on loans. So rather than wait for loan demand to make use of our excess cash, we can deploy those funds now to avoid lost income due to opportunity cost. In the worst case, if we are short on funds when loan demand comes in, we can borrow and still maintain positive margins. Managing and Diversifying Loans In a similar way to deposits, loans often fall victim to an autopilot style of management in which loan demand ebbs and flows based both on volume and the types of loans, with seemingly little that can be done about it. In reality, the loan portfolio can be diversified and managed similarly to the investment portfolio through the use of loan participations. Selling loans can help to manage excess flows in a particular loan type, alleviating concentration risk while also generating some off-balance sheet revenue through servicing income. Purchasing loan participations can help fill the gaps in the loan portfolio where retail demand falls short, allowing us to diversify the loan portfolio and potentially hedge against prepayment or geographic risks. The relevant example is the large amount of refinancing recently seen in the mortgage market, which caused institutions that were mortgage-heavy to experience faster-thanexpected turnover in their loan portfolios, resulting in a loss of income. Investment Portfolio Management Perhaps the biggest victim of opportunity cost is the investment portfolio, especially during times of rising rates and the effect of falling market values. Often boards and ALCOs will put these unrealized losses on investments under a microscope and will pause on purchasing more investments while they seek to understand what has happened. In reality, we tend to ignore the fact that the drop in valuation also affects our loans, a big part of interest rate risk, but more importantly that this is generally good for the balance sheet as a whole. Lower market values on our investments mean there is an opportunity for maturing investments to move into higher rates, allowing our portfolio income to grow and for cash to be invested at a higher spread. The current investments will continue to generate income and, unless we choose to sell them prior to maturity, that loss will eventually disappear as the investment matures. No one can predict exactly where the economy will go from here, and waiting to get a clear direction will only cause us to fall victim to opportunity cost. The only way to properly address these uncertainties is to have strong asset liability management and to take advantage of all the tools available to help cultivate a balance sheet that is well diversified and actively managed across deposits, loans and investments. In this way we ensure that we manage our institutions to the risks we know, as opposed to the unknowns. HB
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3NDExNQ==