The continued and repeated exercise of the power on a routine basis increases the risk of an IRS challenge, so the conservative trustee should show restraint and only exercise the power judicially. the grantor (or pay directly to the applicable taxing authority) for those income taxes attributable to the assets of the trust (known as Tax Reimbursement Power). ATax Reimbursement Power does not reduce the amount of income tax due, but rather allows the trustee to shift the burden of paying the tax liability from the grantor to the trust. Until recently, it remained unclear whether the inclusion of a Tax Reimbursement Power in the terms of a Nebraska trust caused inclusion in the grantor’s gross estate following death. The risk of gross estate inclusion arises from operation of IRC § 2036(a) for transfers with a retained life estate because the grantor of the trust retains access to the trust’s income through reimbursement distributions. The triggering of IRC § 2036(a) risks total inclusion of the trust’s assets, regardless of the amount of income tax liability or distribution made to the grantor for any particular year. In Revenue Ruling 2004-64, the IRS clarified that although a mandatory Tax Reimbursement Power causes gross estate inclusion, a discretionary Tax Reimbursement Power on its own does not. However, when paired with other factors, inclusion may still be a risk. These factors include, but are not limited to: • an understanding or pre-existing arrangement between the grantor and trustee to make reimbursement distributions; • a power retained by the grantor to remove the current trustee and appoint a successor trustee; and • local law subjecting the trust assets to the claims of the grantor’s creditors. Pursuant to the Revenue Ruling, state law is also determinative on the gross estate inclusion issue. If, under applicable state law, the incorporation of a Tax Reimbursement Power causes the trust to be subject to the grantor’s creditors, or to become “self-settled,” then the mere insertion of a Tax Reimbursement Power in the trust causes gross estate inclusion following the grantor’s death. Koley Jessen, PC, LLO prepared the draft legislative language and testified before the Banking, Commerce, and Insurance Committee of the Nebraska Legislature in favor of LB 707, which clarifies under Nebraska law that a Tax Reimbursement Power on its own will not cause gross estate inclusion following a grantor’s death in accordance with Revenue Ruling 2004-64. The Nebraska Legislature passed LB 707 on April 12, 2022, and the Governor signed the bill into law on April 20, 2022. The effective date of the new law is July 20, 2022. LB 707 updates the Nebraska Uniform Trust Code (NUTC) to provide clarity necessary to use Tax Reimbursement Powers in Nebraska IDGTs without the risk of gross tax inclusion. The newly updated NUTC provides: • A trustee’s discretionary reimbursement power on its own will not subject the trust’s assets to the claims of the grantor’s creditors (NUTC § 30-3850(a)(2)(B)); • A trustee’s discretionary reimbursement power on its own will not cause the grantor to be considered a beneficiary of the trust (NUTC § 30-3850(a)(2)(C)); and • Nebraska trustees have a discretionary reimbursement power, so long as that trustee is not considered a “related or subordinate party” to the grantor of the trust under the “grantor trust” rules of the Internal Revenue Code (NUTC § 30-3881(b)). Nationally, 26-plus states have adopted similar legislation to provide clarity that the use of Tax Reimbursement Power alone will not cause gross estate inclusion. It is important to note that the passage of LB 707 only provides advisers and trustees with the platform on which to potentially use a Tax Reimbursement Power. There are other factors to consider when deciding whether to include such a power and the form that power takes within the trust agreement. If drafted incorrectly, a Tax Reimbursement Power may still cause gross estate inclusion. With that said, the passage of LB 707 is just one more step in modernizing the NUTC and provides advisers and trustees alike with one more tool in their toolbox to add f lexibility and value to their wealth transfer planning clients. The advisability on whether a trustee should exercise the Tax Reimbursement Power is fact-specific and should only be determined on a case-by-case basis. The continued and repeated exercise of the power on a routine basis increases the risk of an IRS challenge, so the conservative trustee should show restraint and only exercise the power judiciously. Nate Patterson and Craig Benson are attorneys at Koley Jessen, focusing their practices on estate planning and administration, business succession planning, and tax. Patterson and Benson counsel business owners, families, and individuals, and work closely with CPAs in the structuring and implementation of plans to ensure wealth accumulation and protection for their clients through sophisticated tax minimization and mitigation techniques. For more information, contact them at nathan.patterson@koleyjessen.com and craig.benson@koleyjessen.com, respectively. 9 nebraska society of cpas W W W . N E S C P A . O R G
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTU2Mjk4Mw==