Pub. 6 2024 Issue 3

Additionally, while businesses look to implement effective countermeasures, the rate of digital transformation only continues to pick up. This speed can come at the expense of security. As organizations innovate and embrace digital acceleration, the attack surface expands, and the number of assets requiring advanced security increases, putting them at risk. If they want to protect their organizations from deepfake-related malicious attacks, it is crucial for chief information security officers, or CISOs, to have conversations with senior decision makers to ensure cybersecurity budgets account for the costs associated with implementing new processes, tools, and strategies. Improving organizational risk intelligence can help build a stronger argument to get the necessary funding by quantifying the financial impact of security risks and threats posed by manipulated content. Once sufficient funding has been acquired, several measures may be taken to address the cybersecurity threat posed by deepfakes. First, it is important to develop a strong cybersecurity culture and promote good technology hygiene practices among employees. This includes educating employees about deepfakes, their potential risks, and how to identify them. By training employees to be cautious when interacting with media content, for example, businesses can reduce the likelihood of falling victim to deepfake attacks. Implementing robust authentication measures to ensure only authorized individuals have access to sensitive information or systems is critical. This can involve using multifactor authentication and biometrics to strengthen security. Leveraging a zero-trust approach can also offer several benefits for mitigating attacks. It provides a comprehensive framework for mitigating deepfake cyberattacks by prioritizing strong authentication, access control, continuous monitoring, segmentation, and data protection. Organizations can implement granular access controls, allowing them to restrict access to specific resources based on user roles, privileges, and other contextual factors. By doing so, it helps prevent unauthorized users from gaining access to critical systems and data that could be used to propagate deepfakes. Furthermore, zero trust encourages continuous monitoring of user behavior and network activity and promotes network segmentation and isolation. By actively monitoring for suspicious behavior or anomalies, organizations can detect and respond to potential attacks in real-time, minimizing the damage caused. By separating critical systems and data from less secure areas, organizations can limit the spread of deepfake content and prevent it from infiltrating sensitive areas. Lastly, it protects data at all stages, including data in transit and at rest. By implementing strong encryption and data protection measures, organizations can safeguard their data from being manipulated or tampered with to create deepfakes. In this ever-evolving landscape of AI and cybersecurity, it is essential to remain proactive and adaptive. CONTINUED ON PAGE 28 27 nescpa.org

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3NDExNQ==