percentage yield (APY)? For example, the “triggered terms” could be accessible by clicking on a link labeled “Disclosure.” A: Linking to the additional required terms is allowed, but the link must take the consumer directly to the additional information (not some chain of multiple links to get there). Also, just labeling the link as “Disclosures” might not be clear enough to at least some average consumers. It might be better to have something like, “For additional information, click here” – with the link embedded in the last word. TILA. Q: The percentage of downpayment applies only to “credit sale transactions” – one in which the creditor is the seller – correct? For example, that would include loans the bank extends to finance the sale of repossessed property (home, car, etc.)? If the bank is not advertising financing this type of transaction but a simple transaction for the purchase of a home from some third party, we are permitted to say 80% LTV or 20% downpayment in our advertising with no additional triggered terms, correct? A: Correct. In Regulation Z, “downpayment” is defined so that it applies only to “credit sale transactions.” Therefore, mention – explicitly or implicitly – of a downpayment is not a “triggering term” for general loan advertising, only for advertisements of loans related to credit sale transactions. BSA. Q: In cases of check fraud where a customer’s checks were stolen from the mail and either altered or counterfeited, should the payees on these checks be listed as the subject of a suspicious activity report (SAR), or should they be included only in the narrative and CSV attachment file? Should the $5,000 threshold be used for individual items and a SAR filed on the individual payee or should all fraud items for the business customer be aggregated using the $5,000 threshold? Or should the $25,000 threshold for unknown suspect be used for all fraud items for the business customer and the details of all items be included in the narrative and CSV file? A: The bank will need to determine, based on the information known to them, whether the payees are considered “subjects.” Based on the filing instructions, it would probably be best to treat this all as one event and aggregate the checks and amounts. The bank will need to determine if they have known or unknown subject(s) for the mandatory filing thresholds. Because this bank has payee names, it must decide if that alone meets the definition of a “known suspect/subject.” It is likely the names and/ or identification (ID) used for these people are fake, though. Although the payee names and IDs could be fake, the information may be useful to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) if other SARs were filed using those names (or it could basically be useless). In a situation like this, there are two routes the bank can go. It would be acceptable to just check the box in Part I that all information is “unknown” and list the payees and the amount(s) of the checks that were payable to them, along with the dates and where they were cashed/deposited, in the narrative. Or, if the bank believes the payees have been identified, they could complete a separate Part I for each named suspect (the payee of each check), including only the dollar amount of the check(s) on which they were the listed payee. It would probably be best to report them all on one SAR to tie the activities together against the presumably one organization responsible for them. EFTA. Q: Does Regulation E require an error resolution log to be kept for tracking the dates, amounts/liability, etc.? I am not finding where it says that in the regulation, but management thinks it is a regulatory requirement. I was thinking it was more of an internal procedure/policy. A: Keeping a log or spreadsheet is not specifically required by the regulation. However, Regulation E does require financial institutions to maintain some record of their compliance with its provisions. In addition, when auditors or examiners review an institution’s Regulation E compliance, they usually ask for the log or other record of the Regulation E error resolution process. A log – whether maintained as a written hard copy or an electronic spreadsheet – provides a handy method for maintaining this compliance record, allowing the bank to both track the status of individual error resolutions and document its overall compliance with the applicable rules. TILA/ECOA. Q: Can banks terminate open-end credit lines for inactivity? Are the rules different for home equity lines of credit (HELOC)? If such lines may be terminated for inactivity, are we required to include this information at timeof-loan origination and would we need to send an adverse action notification at the time of termination/closure? A: Whether most types of open-end lines (other than HELOCs) may be closed for inactivity is not addressed by the federal consumer protection laws and regulations, so legal counsel should be consulted for any state law limitations. While not required, it would be prudent to inform customers that account inactivity could lead to the closure of their lines of credit. If such an account is closed, an adverse action notice is required if the termination does not affect all, or substantially all, of a class of the lender’s accounts. HELOCs may be closed only in certain specific circumstances listed in the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z since the late 1980s. Account inactivity is not one of these listed circumstances. NICBONLINE.COM 21
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODQxMjUw